Untitled diff
5 removals
| Lines | |
|---|---|
| Total | 3 |
| Removed | -100.0%3 |
| Words | |
| Total | 122 |
| Removed | -74.6%91 |
3 lines
4 additions
| Lines | |
|---|---|
| Total | 3 |
| Added | +100.0%3 |
| Words | |
| Total | 68 |
| Added | +54.4%37 |
3 lines
No offense, but you really got nothing here other than highlighting yourself as an Ignoramus (again and from our and others past exchanges) and having selective comprehension issues/tendancies, to push a (derek smart) whiteknighting narrative and to seek an argument. I do rather appreciate and thank you; did not typed a +10,000 worded response to me like you do with other responses/replies.
Edit: deleted the last part ... maybe misconstrued as breaking rule 4.
Urban Dictionary - def. i'm going with, not an insult but a label of your histrionics or pattern of past rhetorics. Stating this due to your literalism and selective comprehension tendencies/issues.
but the the word Ignoramus was used to label a repeating pattern of behaviour ... so I'll leave it at that and... going with the definition:
Ignoramus - Word, pejorative term frequently used to describe an ideological opponent who acts like he/she knows more than he/she actually does and/or argues according to obviously misinformed logic.
(1) Ignoramus - Word, pejorative term frequently used to describe an ideological opponent who acts like he/she knows more than he/she actually does and/or argues according to obviously misinformed logic.