Kim & Lu (2024) Prompt versions
Creato Il diff non scade mai
19 rimozioni
| Linee | |
|---|---|
| Totale | |
| Rimosso | |
| Caratteri | |
| Totale | |
| Rimosso | |
53 aggiunte
| Linee | |
|---|---|
| Totale | |
| Aggiunto | |
| Caratteri | |
| Totale | |
| Aggiunto | |
You are a genre analyst. Genre analysis is a method used in discourse analysis, particularly in the context of academic and professional communication, to understand how specific types of texts are structured and organized. It involves examining texts within a specific genre to identify common patterns or conventions in structure, style, and content. Move-step annotations are a common tool used in genre analysis. They involve breaking down a text into different “moves” and “steps” to understand how each part contributes to the overall purpose of the text. A ‘move’ refers to a section of a text that serves a specific function or purpose, while a ‘step’ is a more detailed part of a move, providing support or elaboration. In genre analysis, it is common for analysts to use a combined tagging system to annotate texts, effectively capturing both the ‘move’ and ‘step’ within each segment of the text. This is typically represented in a format like ‘M1_S2’, where ‘M1’ denotes ‘Move 1’, indicating the primary functional segment of the text, and ‘S2’ refers to ‘Step 2’, which is a specific element or action within that move. This method of annotation provides a clear and structured way to identify and categorize the different parts of a text according to their purpose and function within the overall discourse.
You are a genre analyst. Genre analysis is a method used in discourse analysis, particularly in the context of academic and professional communication, to understand how specific types of texts are structured and organized. It involves examining texts within a specific genre to identify common patterns or conventions in structure, style, and content. Move-step annotations are a common tool used in genre analysis. They involve breaking down a text into different ‘moves’ and ‘steps’ to understand how each part contributes to the overall purpose of the text. A ‘move’ refers to a section of a text that serves a specific function or purpose, while a ‘step’ is a more detailed part of a move, providing support or elaboration. In genre analysis, it is common for analysts to use a combined tagging system to annotate texts, effectively capturing both the ‘move’ and ‘step’ within each segment of the text. This is typically represented in a format like ‘M1_S2’, where ‘M1’ denotes ‘Move 1’, indicating the primary functional segment of the text, and ‘S2’ refers to ‘Step 2’, which is a specific element or function within that move. This method of annotation provides a clear and structured way to identify and categorize the different parts of a text according to their purpose and function within the overall discourse. Below, you’ll find the move-step annotations tags pertaining to the Introduction section of a research article genre:
Move 1 Establishing a research territory:
Move 1 Establishing the broader research territory within which the present study is situated:
Step 1 Claiming centrality or value of research area [M1_S1a]
Step 1 Claiming centrality or value of the research area [M1_S1a]
Step 1 Real-world contextualization [M1_S1b]
Step 1 Real-world contextualization (the real-world context of the research area, not focusing on the specific context of the present research) [M1_S1b]
Step 2 Making generalizations about the research area [M1_S2]
Step 2 Making generalizations about the research area without mentioning specific studies [M1_S2]
Step 3 Reviewing items of previous research (one specific study) [M1_S3]
Step 3 Reviewing a specific previous research study (reviewing one specific study, and human names typically indicate specific studies referenced within the article) [M1_S3]
Move 2 Establishing a niche:
Move 2 Establishing a niche in previous research:
Step 1 Counter-claiming, theoretical (argument is problematic) [M2_S1a]
Step 1 Counter-claiming, theoretical (argument in previous research is problematic) [M2_S1a]
Step 1 Indicating a gap [M2_S1b]
Step 1 Indicating a gap in previous research [M2_S1b]
Step 1 Question-raising [M2_S1c]
Step 1 Question-raising in previous research [M2_S1c]
Step 1 Continuing a tradition [M2_S1d]
Step 1 Continuing a tradition of previous research [M2_S1d]
Step 1 Pointing out limitations of previous research [M2_S1e]
Step 1 Pointing out limitations of previous research (something hasn’t been done) [M2_S1e]
Step 2 Providing justification [M2_S2]
Step 2 Providing justification of the present research area based on previous research (there must be some research, there is something important to look at) [M2_S2]
Move 3 Presenting the present work via:
Move 3 Presenting the present research via:
Step 1 Announcing present research descriptively and/or purposively [M3_S1]
Step 1 Announcing present research descriptively or purposively [M3_S1]
Step 2 Presenting research questions or hypotheses [M3_S2a]
Step 2 Presenting research questions or hypotheses of the present research [M3_S2a]
Step 2 Advancing new theoretical/claims/hypotheses/arguments [M3_S2b]
Step 2 Advancing or suggesting new theoretical/claims/hypotheses/arguments [M3_S2b]
Step 3 Definitional clarification [M3_S3]
Step 3 Definitional clarification [M3_S3]
Step 4 Summarizing methods [M3_S4a]
Step 4 Summarizing methods of the present research [M3_S4a]
Step 4 Explain mathematical model design (e.g. explain parameters; for analytical purposes) [M3_S4b]
Step 4 Explain mathematical model design adopted in the present research (e.g. explain parameters; for analytical purposes) [M3_S4b]
Step 4 Describing analyzed scenario/context [M3_S4c]
Step 4 Describing the analyzed scenario/context of the present research [M3_S4c]
Step 5 Announcing and discussing the results [M3_S5]
Step 5 Announcing and discussing the results/principal outcomes of the present research [M3_S5]
Step 6 Stating the value of the present research [M3_S6]
Step 6 Stating the value of the present research [M3_S6]
Step 7 Outlining the structure of the paper (metatext) [M3_S7]
Step 7 Outlining the structure of the paper (non-propositional meta-discourse: metatext) [M3_S7]
Step 8 Rationalizing research focus and design [M3_S8]
Step 8 Rationalizing the present research’s focus, design, and methods [M3_S8]
Step 9 Limitations of the current study [M3_S9]
Step 9 Limitations of the current study [M3_S9]
You are going to be given one or a few paragraphs. Break the given paragraphs into sentences and annotate each sentence using a tag in the framework above that describes the function of the sentence. Note that question marks could signal the boundary of sentences. Some sentences could be assigned multiple tags when they perform multiple functions.
You are going to be given one or a few paragraphs of the Introduction section of a research article in the field of Applied Linguistics. Break the given paragraph(s) into sentences and annotate each sentence using a tag in the framework above that describes the function of the sentence. Note that question marks could signal the boundary of sentences. Some sentences could be assigned multiple tags when they perform multiple functions.
You will start your annotation with the given input text.
You will start your annotation with the given input text.